Total Pageviews

Tuesday, June 29, 2021

Nobody Rings A Bell

by Lance Roberts

An old Wall Street adage says, "no one rings a bell at the top of the market."

Near peaks of market cycles, investors get swept up by the underlying exuberance. That exuberance breeds the "rationalization" that "this time is different." 

How do you know the market is exuberant currently? Sentiment Trader had a great graphic on this last week.

"This type of market activity is an indication that markets have returned their 'enthusiasm' stage. Such is characterized by:

  • High optimism
  • Easy credit (too easy, with loose terms)
  • A rush of initial and secondary offerings
  • Risky stocks outperforming
  • Stretched valuations"

Warnings, Technically Speaking: Warnings From Behind The Curtain

Currently, we are seeing every box checked. Irrational exuberance from investors, easy credit with investors taking out personal loans to buy stocks, and risky stocks outperforming. The level of exuberance currently matches previous major market peaks, the only missing ingredient is a catalyst to start the reversal.

The biggest problem is that investors are crowded into a theatre with a single exit. When the selling starts, the exit will become very narrow, very fast.


The Trouble Ahead

The Trap Is Set for Economic Collapse

By Andy Snyder

The inflation debate continues...

Will prices keep rising? Is it already over?

What should we do about it?

Most folks wise enough to pay attention know you can't pull the economy in one direction without something else being pushed in another.

Record-low interest rates, free money and trillions in freshly printed cash are certainly yanking us around.

History begs to tell us that trouble will eventually head our way.

But what will the next stage look like?

We got into it a bit on Friday. But today, we take a deeper dive.

It's an economic tale that may sound a lot like what's happening today... but this one is 400 years old.

In fact, this is a tale of what many believe to be the first major economic collapse. It's not something that gets talked about often, but it's eerily similar to what's happening today.

It's called "Kipper and Wipper."

And it slammed the German states in the early 1620s.


 

Cutting Corners

We could write essay after essay on the cause and effect of the meltdown that led to the fall of the Kingdom of Germany. But we don't need to. It's all really quite simple.

The many states (there were nearly 2,000 of them) and the many rulers of the region were preparing for battle. The Thirty Years' War was getting hot.

As all power-hungry rulers are wont to do, the royalty funded their war by taking from the commoners.

In this case, they didn't levy taxes or sell some bonds. They were much more covert. They aimed at the currency...

You see, rulers of the time weren't quite devious enough to figure out the idea of a fiat currency. They could only dream of issuing money backed by nothing more than their word (oh the wars they could have started). Their money wasn't even backed by silver or gold.

It was silver and gold.

German currency at the time was no more complex than a precisely measured chunk of precious metal, mainly silver.

Unlike in the modern monetary system, rulers couldn't simply dump new bills into the economy. They couldn't fund a war by printing money to fund their own debt (what's happening all over the world today). Instead, if they wanted to add to the money supply, they had to add to the silver supply. Not an easy feat today... and even harder in 1620.

But the rulers were in power because they were smart and cunning. They quickly realized they could trim just a wee piece of silver from each coin and melt it into more coins.

Voila... the first form of quantitative easing.

It's Happening Again

As the furor of war grew, more and more states in the region got in the game. They funded their fight by squaring the edges of their coins.

Soon, a sort of carry trade not all that different from what we see today erupted. Savvy traders would take debased coins from one country and convert them into good coins from the next. Then they'd haul the good coins back home and sell them for a premium, loading up on more bad coins.

The cycle worked great... until it didn't.

Soon enough, the rich got much richer and the poor got much poorer.

Countries raced to devalue their currencies faster than others. Inflation began to soar. Angry mobs took to the streets.

The folks who were hurt the most weren't the rulers who eventually lost power. No, it was the everyday folks who relied on the economy to survive... those who couldn't sustain themselves and were dependent on ordinary wages.

Their income didn't change, but the value of the coins they received on payday did. They could no longer afford food, and they didn't have the land or the know-how to grow food on their own.

Countless people suffered - all because their rulers had bills to pay.

Our point here is quite simple. What happened during the Kipper and Wipper (which literally translates, by the way, to "tipper and seesaw" - a reference to what coin dealers were doing with their scales) crisis is not all that different from what we're seeing around the globe today.

Countries are racing to debase their money. They're racing to undercut the values of their trade partners' currencies. And they're printing bad money to pay for good work.

If the input is the same... the output must also be the same. To believe anything else is plain ignorant.

As investors, we must understand our not-so-modern past. If we don't, we'll fall into the same traps and wind up in the same situations. Economic collapse is not something reserved for the history books.

Look around. See what's happening. It's eerily similar to what happened some 400 years ago.

Killing the currency is not a new concept.

It's been making folks poorer for centuries.

Be well,

Andy

Monday, June 28, 2021

"American Jobs Plan" promises to make pigs fly......

The Biden administration's $6.25 trillion "American Jobs Plan" promises... 

By P.J. O'Rourke

.....................

Oh, what doesn't it promise?

... reliable transportation, safe water, affordable housing, healthy schools, clean electricity, broadband for all, five golden rings, four calling birds, three French hens, two turtle doves, and a partridge in a pear tree.

I may be slightly misquoting the last part. But not by much.

This article would be much shorter if I made a list of what the American Jobs Plan is not vowing to accomplish. In fact, I might be able to write the piece in three words...

Make pigs fly.

Such moments have come before. There was the moment when Lenin nationalized all business and industry in the U.S.S.R., the moment when Stalin collectivized Soviet agriculture, the moment Hitler decided to pay off the German national debt by conquering Europe, the moment Mao announced his "Great Leap Forward." Not to mention the moments of reimagining a new economy in Mussolini's Italy, Kim Il-sung's North Korea, Castro's Cuba, Pol Pot's Cambodia, etc.

But economic facts are economic facts no matter what any White House "Fact Sheet" proclaims. And we divorce ourselves from facts at our peril.

The idea that a government can "reimagine" a "new" economy is a foolish and stupid proposition. Try going to the person to whom you're married and telling him or her you're "reimagining a new spouse." What fun!

Speaking of which, there are the remaining 26.5 pages of hogwash about letting every governmental pig out of every programmatic sty to cause an immense pork stampede trampling the nation on its way to feed at the taxation trough.

...................

This Led to Declines Every Time in the Past 93 Years

There is some weird stuff happening under the surface of the market.

Early last week, the percentage of S&P 500 members above their 50-day moving averages had plunged, even while the majority were still above their 200-day averages. That has tended to be a good sign.

But...

The problem is what's happened in recent sessions. Despite a push to new highs in the S&P toward the end of the week, the percentage of its members above their averages barely budged. In terms of divergences, this one is gonzo.

Going back to the mid-1920's, there have only been a handful of dates with breaks like this. It happened in 1929, 1959, 1963, 1972, 1998, and 1999, and all of them ended up preceding losses in stocks.

Several more days (or weeks) with this kind of behavior should trigger all kinds of risk warnings, the types of things we've been watching for since speculation reached its heights in February.

Sunday, June 27, 2021

A controversial breakthrough but has its merit....

We all know the US is currently under the control by a dementia, a fake president who has no idea what he is doing. 


The whole world has seen a joke of the terrible performance the Fake President Biden put on at the G-7 meeting (forgetting things, getting lost, generally bumbling around).




While it is a grave pity for the US managed by such an idiot, we are seeing some hope as the world's very first anti-dementia drug has just got approved.  However, the clearance of this Alzheimer's disease drug, aducanumab, has since proven to be highly controversial. The FDA has faced criticism for approving the drug over the objections of its outside expert advisory committee, and three of the panelists have resigned. One, Aaron Kesselheim, a top Harvard doctor, called the decision "probably the worst drug approval decision in recent U.S. history." Nevertheless, I think Biden may be a great patient to use this drug, which may help him, which will accordingly help the US, regain the sanity somewhat😜😏

Investment wise, BIIB has decisively broken through its 5 year sideway trading range following this breakthrough approval. Right now the initial euphoria is fading, a normal post-excitement reaction. I can easily see it decline towards its upper end of the trading range, now the support around $320 or even a bit lower. We are yet to see if this support can hold as the controversial approval may have some lingering effect. But most likely it can and it will become its launch dock for its next leg up.
  



Thursday, June 24, 2021

I'm glad I'm short AMZN

First about the market. While the market price action is quite bullish and is making all time highs again, I think the market is setting up for a big decline in the next week or two. The recent bullish moves are made on quite thin volume and nearly all the momentum indicators are waning and negative divergence has shown up in all the indicators. And VIX has declined to the lowest point in a year.  This is not a bullish setup for a sustainable uptrend, at least now in the near term. That's why I think we are going to see a sizable cultput for VIX that is usually associated with a sharp decline of stocks.

One stock to short for me is Amazon. Yes, you hear me right that I'm shorting AMZN!! 

There's an old Wall Street saying – "buy the rumor, sell the news." Unlike a lot of things on the Street, this actually makes a lot of sense, and it can easily work in your favor. It's a cliché for a good reason, and it's nearly universal. In anticipation of some "event," be it an earnings report, a product launch, executive shakeup, a regulatory approval – whatever – traders bid the price of a stock up and up in anticipation of cashing in. Then when the event actually happens, those traders take that cash and run, sending the stock lower. They buy the rumor, they sell the news. Rinse and repeat.

Amazon's no different. Last year, Prime Day began on Oct. 13 – a day that capped an impressive 13%, one-week rise for what was at the time a $1.5 trillion company. After the big Prime Day 2020 event, with $9.9 billion fresh on the books… AMZN shares sank like a stone for weeks until the end of October. Traders did what traders do and sold the news. AMZN shares are up nearly 10% year to date and a little less than 8% over the past month. So Amazon's certainly coming into Prime Day 2021 in strong shape. The thing is, no matter how good the past two days' numbers are, history and momentum tell us it won't be enough to keep the rally going.

The real problem I can see about Amazon is its poor TA. While its price action is really strong to move higher these days, the uptrend is associated with consistent negative divergence nearly in all the timeframes, which suggests such kind of up move is not sustainable. My gut feeling is that Amazon is setting up again for a sell the news moment, following the closure of the Primary Day. Fortunately I have set up a couple of short positions in the past few days. Sure enough, Amazon is crashing today with a haircut for nearly 2%. I have taken partial profit and keep some shorts still in place. I think AMZN is moving towards low $3300ish in the weeks ahead.  

Wednesday, June 23, 2021

What do you think of this story?

Joe and Kamala's Not-So-Excellent Adventures
By Buck Sexton

What exactly did President Joe Biden accomplish at the recent G7 meeting? The only thing we know for sure is... not much.

There were plenty of photo ops – and to be fair, that's what most of these present-day world-leader gabfests devolve into. Germany's Angela Merkel daintily touching elbows with Canada's Justin Trudeau is a far cry from Stalin, FDR, and Churchill at the Yalta Conference.

There were also a number of (to put it gently) evident senior moments where Biden seemed more than a little foggy... Sitting down with other heads of state at a conference table, he interrupted British Prime Minister Boris Johnson to remind him to include South African President Cyril Ramaphosa in his introductions, even though Johnson had just said his name.

Amtrak Joe also wandered around aimlessly in front of the cameras to some chuckles from bystanders. And then there was the unsettlingly long pause during a press conference when the commander in chief was asked about Vladimir Putin and started to drift off into mumbles and murmurs.

On the frequent talking point of "standing up to Russia," the media's presentation of Biden has been laughable propaganda... Who can forget the recent cover of Time magazine with Biden's face on it? They tried to make old man Joe look like the second coming of Maverick from Top Gun, with mirrored aviators proudly staring down the Kremlin's premier thug.

If only it were so for Joe... When it comes to Russia, Biden's plans are as muddled as his short-term memory.

What does "standing up to Russia" really mean? Almost all of what Biden says on the subject is pablum meant more as a nod to the "Russia collusion"-obsessed Democrats back at home than meaningful diplomatic pushback.

For the average MSNBC watcher, Putin has been the subject of hysteria for years. Thanks to nightly Russia conspiracy-theorizing by Rachel Maddow and other shows, a widespread Democrat delusion persists that Putin stole the election for Trump in 2016.

And as far as the Russians are concerned, Biden is an effectual clown. It has been considered a truism among the foreign policy intelligentsia for almost 40 years that Biden has been reliably wrong on every decision the U.S. government has faced on the world stage. For our more determined and opportunistic enemies – with Putin certainly high on that list – Biden can easily be outmaneuvered.

The media has not been entirely unprepared for Biden to seem out of his depth or outright confused. Most of their focus has been on presenting him as America's affable grandfather who will adeptly glad-hand our allies while talking tough to the world's neighborhood bullies. While this simplistic narrative around the most powerful man in the world is cynical, it's also reasonably effective politics.

Joe's foreign policy emphasizes "repairing the U.S.'s alliances," which he says have been "damaged" under the Trump administration and claims that he can return the U.S. to a "position of trusted leadership" to counter challenges from Russia and China.

But no honest observer believes that Biden will leave a meaningful mark on foreign policy... Yet Joe has honed the projection of self-effacing affability over decades of political life. While that's not going to mean a thing to Russia or China, it does create enough spin for the Democrat media to portray his first foreign trip as good enough.

Vice President Kamala Harris, on the other hand, is just happy that last week's news cycle is a thing of the past. The Veep's first trip outside the U.S. to Guatemala and Mexico was generally considered cringeworthy on both sides of the aisle. When asked why Kamala (the "border czar" no less) hadn't actually been to the U.S.-Mexico border, she tried several times to claim that "we" have been to the border.

Even Lester Holt – an NBC News anchor liked by Democrats who expects high-level access from the Biden White House – thought this was too much malarkey for one interview. He forced Kamala to clarify that if by "go to the border" she meant actually going there, then no she has not in fact made the trek...

It was a moment that the VP's handlers and media allies want to brush aside, but it dominated the news cycle for a full day last week – and rightly so... The situation at the border is grave, as I detailed firsthand in Here's What I Witnessed at the Most Lawless Part of the U.S.-Mexico Border.

Kamala's defining political characteristic appears to be phoniness – which anyone who remembers her ill-fated presidential run could see in the data from those in her own party. But despite her obvious charisma deficit, she remains a likely Democrat presidential candidate for the next election... and could become president much sooner than many anticipate.

American presidents, at least when they're Democrats, stand astride the world stage during trips abroad and build their gravitas. With Biden and Harris, the first outing of this administration outside our borders was a reminder that the press corps can only prop them up so much.

Biden has always been a self-interested politico, and a mediocre one at best...

Despite the media's hopes, he cannot carry the world on his shoulders as Atlas. We will be lucky if by the end of this term he can remember what world he's even in.

When Almost Every Stock Rises, This Happens

Following the quick flash down last week due to the hawkish FOMC tone, the market has bounced back strongly, probably more than "strongly" as it has not only gained back everything it has lost, it has managed to be on the verge of challenging its new all time highs. It is quite impressive of course for the bull's tenacity but can that bullishness be maintained? See below the historical data to get an idea what is most likely coming in the few weeks ahead.  

******************************************************** 

With internal weakness that's been festering for a while, then a dip in most stocks to end last week, some sensitive breadth measures neared oversold territory. Monday's surge took care of much of that.

Traders get excited when there is a lopsided day in the markets. On Monday, it was all-aboard to the upside, with few stocks failing to rise. There have been more than 450 net advancing stocks within the S&P 500 only five other times in the past five years. 

S&P 500 advance decline best days

Monday, June 21, 2021

War on Wealth

ProPublica... and the Ongoing "War on Wealth"

Alexander Green 

If you're like most Americans, you probably imagined that the tax return you file with the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) each year is private and secure.

Moreover, that if some nefarious employee, cybercriminal or rogue nation hacked the IRS and stole it, no reputable news outlet would publish that information.

But thanks to the actions this month of ProPublica - a group that calls itself "a nonprofit newsroom that investigates abuses of power" - we now know that's not true.

It's another example of the War on Wealth being waged by academia and the mainstream media.

According to the eggheads and scaremongers, there are only a few ways that Americans get rich.

They steal money. They inherit it. They cheat people. They buy a congressman. Or they get lucky.

(That's why you hear folks with a high income or net worth described as "the fortunate.")

For some, the adjective "wealthy" itself is a slur.

According to this view, if you've worked, saved, invested and compounded for decades, you're not only selfish and greedy... You've deprived more deserving souls of that money.

Ergo, the wealthiest are not the folks who have provided the most people with what they want or need. They are the biggest sinners.

ProPublica wants to make sure everyone understands that. Even if they have to be underhanded to argue it.

The organization took IRS data they knew to be stolen, sorted out the nation's wealthiest individuals, divided their income taxes paid by Forbes magazine's estimates of their net worth, and declared that their "true tax rate" - ProPublica's own made-up phrase - is miniscule.

This is a tempest in a thimble...

No one pays income taxes each year based on the unrealized gains on their real estate, business or investment portfolio.

And that's a good thing.

Private businesses, farms, art collections and many other assets are neither liquid nor easy to value.

The vast majority of countries that have had wealth taxes have already gotten rid of them.

They quickly learned that wealth taxes are difficult to determine, hard to collect, don't raise much money and incentivize high-net-worth individuals (and their precious capital) to leave the country.

Moreover, the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution states plainly that private property shall not be taken for public use without just compensation.

In short, ProPublica concocted a fable using stolen data to stoke envy and resentment against the nation's highest-net-worth individuals.

The real story would have been a snoozefest.

The U.S. tax code allows deductions. ProPublica's report provided no evidence that the ones used by the nation's wealthiest were illegitimate.

(Think business expenses and charitable donations, not offshore bank accounts.)

No one in this country pays more income taxes when their homes or investment portfolios go up and they haven't sold.

More to the point, no one calculates their "true tax rate" by dividing their annual income taxes by their net worth.

Yet ProPublica's chief, Richard Tofel, called this news release "the most important story we have ever published."

That says a lot, if not what he intended.

The real goal, of course, was to stoke outrage against wealth accumulation and provide cover for those in Congress pushing for confiscatory tax rates.

But do the rich pay their fair share?

That depends on whom we call rich and what we call fair. But everyone should be aware of the basic facts.

According to the National Taxpayers Union, the top 1% of income earners pay more than 40% of all income taxes, the top 5% pay over 60% and the top 10% pay more than 70%.

Some will insist that "the rich" should pay even more of the total. And we could have that argument.

But let's be clear... The idea ProPublica is promoting - that the rich pay little or nothing in federal income taxes - is a myth.

The IRS reports that the very top earners pay an effective income tax rate of 32%.

Some look at billionaires and insist that no one can spend that much money.

But there is more you can do with a fortune - ethically and legally accumulated - than spend it.

You can help other people and organizations, give to worthy causes, and invest it for productive use.

Our capitalist system connects owners of wealth and people with good ideas.

That creates jobs, improves our standard of living and enriches us all. (It also generates many trillions in tax revenue.)

Academics and journalists don't get this.

Or worse, they do, but still believe that large fortunes ought to be confiscated by the government for the "public good."

There's a reason this is unconstitutional.

Our free market system incentivizes working, saving and investing. And it has helped make us the richest nation in the world.

By the way, you might be surprised to learn - from a global perspective - just who is rich and how much is a fortune.

If you make $32,000 a year, you're a global one-percenter.

And if you have $4,210 to your name, you are richer than half the world's residents.

Let the confiscation and redistribution begin...

Friday, June 18, 2021

More topping sign: Stocks Will Lose 36% !

As expected, the Fed is sounding a bit worrisome for the inflation and is thinking to tighten the liquidity sooner than expected. The market is cracking immediately. But 1-2% decline so far is just the ice on the cake. If you are already feeling some pain, then be ready for piercing pain. Likely this is just the enteree before the major attack hits later. For next week, I think there is a high chance we may see S&P down to 4100ish after it broke down below its major support around 4177. Then we should see a decent bounce back to lure a lot of people back into the market again before mounting another deep down strike. The fun is probably just starting.😏😎

Happy Father's Day!   

 

This Indicator Predicts Stocks Will Lose 36% Through 2023 (by SentimenTrader)

Consumers are flush, and they've got a whole lot riding on markets.

The latest Federal Reserve data on household assets, just released with a delay for Q1, shows that once again, equities have pushed to a record relative to all household financial assets. At 36.5% of all assets, mutual funds and equities account for a greater share than any point since at least 1952.

The chart below shows this measure against the S&P 500's return over the next decade. There has been a clear negative correlation, meaning that as households allocate more of their assets to stocks, future returns on those stocks decrease. 

Ratio of household stock allocation to total assets

A similar look at the data shows the thing but in an even more extreme way. Relative to the country's output, stock holdings have soared and far surpass any historical extreme. When looking at those correlations to future returns, it suggests a 36% loss for stocks over the next 2 years. Of course, it's been extreme since 2015, so anyone using it as a bearish crutch has been hurting. 

One of the largest asset allocators in the market, pension funds, also picked up their stock exposure. At nearly 81% of all assets, funds are nearing a record allocation to stocks. 

There weren't many sectors that did well after peaks in the Equity / GDP Ratio. It's not a big surprise that the ones that held up the best tended to be more defensive. 

Wednesday, June 16, 2021

Why it is a great thing to pay as little tax as possible to the insatiable government!

A Tax on Jeff Bezos Is a Cruel Tax on All of Us
By John Tamny

"It turns out many of the very richest Americans pay almost nothing in taxes." Those are the words of Ryan Cooper, a journalist for The Week. As readers can doubtless imagine, Cooper's assertion came after private tax records were illegally leaked from the IRS to the Lefty media nonprofit, ProPublica.

Cooper's analysis missed in a variety of ways... Indeed, it's useful to point out that as opposed to "almost nothing," Jeff Bezos paid more than $4 billion in federal taxes in the years Cooper contends he largely avoided them.

Which is the point... Bezos is way overtaxed. Really, what about 4 billion is "almost nothing"?

Regarding what you're about to read, there's already voluminous commentary along with correctives about how most of the mega-billionaires in our midst don't take in a lot of income... that their wealth is largely equity-based, that they can't be taxed unless a capital gain is realized, that they paid the taxes that the law requires them to pay. It all sounds very defensive. It implies that the rich, just because they're rich, would and should pay more in taxes but for a tax code that favors them, and that creates ways for them to avoid paying their "fair share."

But such a view is offensive. The Right must stop hiding behind a tax code as the legal "reason" why the rich don't pay more. They should also cease "modeling" ways for the Treasury to take in more tax dollars by virtue of lowering the rate of taxation. If they're for limited government, they should live up to their rhetoric by fighting endlessly for lower federal tax collections. Period.

As for members of the Left, their belief that the rich don't pay enough in taxes is rather contradictory. Lest we forget, this is a Left-wing that spends its days and nights seeking to end discrimination of all kinds. It seems the ideology's virtuousness only extends so far. If you have the temerity to be rich, the expectation is that you should be treated very differently by elected officials... Some would call that discrimination.

The only proper indictment of the U.S. tax code is that Bezos has billions legally taxed away from him.

Really, why should Bezos be forced to cough up so much in taxes relative to, for instance, journalist Ryan Cooper? But wait, you say, there aren't enough zeros to calculate the wealth gap between Bezos and Cooper... And that's true enough. And why is that? Might the wealth disparity between the two have something to do with how frustrating life would be if Bezos were to suddenly shut down the source of his world-leading net worth? Conversely, would anyone notice if Cooper stops writing (short of his parents, perhaps a spouse)? But that misses the point...

The point is, a tax code that penalizes some people to the tune of billions plainly violates the very American belief in equal protection before the law. In this case, some are plucked lightly or not at all, while the productive have to hand over wealth in the ten figures.

To which some will screech, "They earned more, so they should pay more. It's only fair!" Except that such a response vandalizes reason... and not just because there's nothing fair about a tax code that takes specific aim at achievement.

What's most unfair about people like Bezos paying more taxes is that we all suffer the more that Bezos pays. There's no escaping the burden of excessive taxes foisted on the Seattle centi-billionaire. Think about it...

Every dollar that Bezos sends to the U.S. Treasury is an extra dollar of control that Nancy Pelosi, Kevin McCarthy, Chuck Schumer, Mitch McConnell, and Joe Biden have over the U.S. economy. We know from the 20th century that political control of economic resources fails in an impoverishing, brutal fashion. What fails in total also fails in limited fashion. Politicians quite simply can't allocate precious resources.

It's not a Democrat or Republican thing, and it's really not even a story of politicians lacking the skills to invest... More realistically, even Warren Buffett would be a tragically bad investor if he were Senator Buffett and charged with doling out trillions every year. Politicians can't invest effectively simply because every dollar spent by politicians attracts a constituency reliant on the monies spent, at which point, it's exceedingly difficult to mothball that which stops making sense.

While in the private sector our investment darlings that fail are routinely killed off (Silicon Valley startups die to the tune of 90%-plus), in the public sector bad ideas generally live forever... forever consuming precious resources. The more that Bezos hands over to the Treasury, the more bad investments and programs will be given life, seemingly in perpetuity. What lives in perpetuity on our dime ensures less in the way of intrepid, market-informed investment in the real economy. The private economy has in recent decades produced Amazon, Google, and a revived Apple... while Congress has thrown billions more at what personifies irritation like Amtrak, the Passport Office, and the U.S. Postal Service. Get it? And the burden of government doesn't stop with taxes paid now.

Any entity known to have substantial legal access to the wealth created by others soon enough has substantial borrowing power. Translated for those who need it – the billions Bezos sends to Washington empowers the U.S. Treasury to borrow in copious amounts against future billions that Bezos will inevitably pay in taxes. Real-time tax collection enables the cruel tax that is government spending, and it also enables a multiple of the spending tax as investors price in future taxes to be paid by the rich.

Members of the Left should put away their pitchforks, while folks on the Right should mothball their revenue models. As evidenced by the economy-sapping size of the federal government in the here and now, a tax on Jeff Bezos is a tax on us all.

Another warning sign from the hot lumber

Is The Crash in the Lumber to Gold Ratio a Good Sell Signal? (by SentimenTrader)

The ratio of lumber to gold is crashing, and it's raising concerns among some investors.

Lumber is considered a proxy for economic growth since it's an input to many construction projects. Gold is considered a "safe haven" asset that investors flock to in times of duress. Both assertions are questionable, but when the ratio of lumber to gold is rising, the theory is that investors are focused more on growth than safety, and it's a risk-on environment. 

Ever since the Optimism Index on lumber hit 90%, lumber has been in a free-fall, surpassing the last couple of post-euphoria crashes in speed, if not magnitude.

The last time the ratio crash, it preceded trouble in the S&P.

Crash in lumber to gold ratio

The trouble with charts is their subjectivity. So, we went back to the inception of the futures market for both contracts and looked at every time when the lumber / gold ratio cycled from a 3-year high to a 50-day low. On average, it took 29 days for the ratio to cycle like this, which is quick. 

It was not a good reason to sell stocks. The S&P 500 did crack a couple of times, including the one noted above. It preceded the 1990 recession scare and kinda-sorta the popping of the 2000 bubble. It was, however, a pretty good reason to sell lumber. 

Tuesday, June 15, 2021

The topping process: Slowly At First, Then All At Once

This is a very good writeup about the current market topping process, which will inevitably lead to a bear market that is likely a prolonged and severe one, given how much froth has currently been built in. 
*******************************************************

Still A Bull Market

Today, Central Banks globally continue their monetary injection programs, rate policies remain at zero, and global economic growth is weak. Moreover, with stock valuations at historically extreme levels, the value currently ascribed to future earnings growth almost guarantees low future returns.

As discussed previously:

"Like a rubber band stretched too far – it must get relaxed in order to stretch again. The same applies to stock prices that are anchored to their moving averages. Trends that get overextended in one direction, or the other, always return to their long-term average. Even during a strong uptrend or strong downtrend, prices often move back (revert) to a long-term moving average."

The chart below shows the deviation in the market price above and below the 75-week moving average. Historically, as prices approach 200-points above the long-term moving average, corrections ensued. Thus, the difference between a "bull market" and a "bear market" is when the deviations occur BELOW the long-term moving average consistently. 

Since 2017, with the globally coordinated interventions of Central Banks, those deviations have started exceeding levels not seen previously. As of the end of May, the index was nearly 800 points above the long-term average or 4x the normal warning level. 

Slowly First All Once, Technically Speaking: Slowly At First, Then All At Once

We can see the magnitude of the current deviation by switching to percentage deviations. Historically, 10% deviations have preceded corrections and bear markets. Currently, that deviation is 22.5% above the long-term mean.

Slowly First All Once, Technically Speaking: Slowly At First, Then All At Once

Notably, the decline below the long-term average reversed quickly, keeping the "bull market" trend intact.

Conclusion

Understanding that change is occurring is what is essential. But, unfortunately, the reason investors "get trapped" in bear markets is that when they realize what is happening, it is far too late to do anything about it.

Bull markets are lure investors into believing "this time is different." When the topping process begins, that slow, arduous affair gets met with continued reasons why the "bull market will continue."  The problem comes when it eventually doesn't. As noted, "bear markets" are swift and brutal attacks on investor capital.

As Ben Graham wrote in 1959:

"'The more it changes, the more it's the same thing.' I have always thought this motto applied to the stock market better than anywhere else. Now the really important part of the proverb is the phrase, 'the more it changes.'

The economic world has changed radically and will change even more. Most people think now that the essential nature of the stock market has been undergoing a corresponding change. But if my cliché is sound, then the stock market will continue to be essentially what it always was in the past, a place where a big bull market is inevitably followed by a big bear market.

In other words, a place where today's free lunches are paid for doubly tomorrow. In the light of recent experience, I think the present level of the stock market is an extremely dangerous one."

Pay attention to the market. The action this year is very reminiscent of previous market topping processes. Tops are hard to identify during the process as "change happens slowly." The mainstream media, economists, and Wall Street will dismiss pickup in volatility as simply a corrective process. But when the topping process completes, it will seem as if the change occurred "all at once."

  by Lance Roberts  

Monday, June 14, 2021

Warning signs everywhere....

For now, the market bullish trend remains intact. Actually the sentiment is exceedingly exuberant about markets once again, with numerous analysts suggesting nothing but "blue skies" ahead. No surprises that we are seeing new highs again. But can this trend be sustainable? Sure it can but with substantially increasing risks ahead. In this situation, being excessively complacent and not applying some risk management to portfolios will leave you flat-footed when the correction does come. And we are seeing more and more warning signs coming up, suggesting a sizable correction is on the way. I share a few below shared by my friend. 

For one, the market breadth (advancing stocks vs. declining stocks) is EXTREMELY stretched above its 200-day moving average (DMA), which could be the biggest stretch in years (see the red circle in the chart below), if not in all of history.

Market Breadth

Previous episodes in which breadth was in a similar place relative to its 200-DMA saw significant corrections occur (those in the below chart with red rectangles).

Market Breadth Past Corrections

A correction in market breadth down to its 200-DMA would correspond with the S&P 500 falling to test 3,500. That seems rather extreme, but a drop to test the 50-DMA doesn't seem far-fetched. Such a drop would see the S&P 500 fall to 4,000.

Market Breadth vs Sp500

Here is another one. Currently, complacency has reached more extreme levels. As noted in the chart below, the 15-day moving average of VIX, on an inverted scale, suggests a correction is likely.

Reviewing Market Signals 06-11-21, Reviewing Market Signals As Warnings Increase 06-11-21

"The market may have one last push higher over the next several weeks. Such will take the VIX even lower and complete the VIX wedge pattern. That pattern has been evident in the last three 10% or greater corrections. By this measure, the correction should begin somewhere around July 21st – August 10th." – Jim Colquitt

Morgan Stanley's market timing indicator is also at levels typically associated with market downturns. Just for reference, the current reading is the most "bearish" on record.

Reviewing Market Signals 06-11-21, Reviewing Market Signals As Warnings Increase 06-11-21

What would trigger such a collapse? There are certainly no shortages of possibilities:

  • The economy rolls over.

  • Inflation begins to eat into profit margins, lowering corporate profits.

  • Inflation expectations soar suggesting the Fed will be forced to taper/ end its interventions and tighten monetary policy.

  • A true black swan even no one sees coming (another COVID-19 variant? War? A major funding issue with a foreign bank?)
While no one can know for sure what will trigger a market crash, I personally think the most likely trigger will be a black swan like event that is out of anyone's thinking range at the moment. This will be a moment like the rug being pulled out suddenly from underneath when everyone is dancing on it!😭😨

Friday, June 11, 2021

$100 Oil Is Coming.

$100 Oil Is Coming... And It Spells Trouble for the Economy
By Trish Regan

At the gas pumps this summer, Americans are about to experience something they haven't felt in years... sticker shock.

Already in California, gas prices are upwards of $4 a gallon... And Hawaii and Nevada are close to it, too. Mendocino, California boasts the highest gas prices in the country – at Schlafer's Auto Body & Repair, it will cost you $6.73 per gallon to fill up your tank.

And summer, with all its road trips, hasn't even kicked into full gear yet!

I've been calling for $75 to $100/barrel oil by summer since January of this year... And unfortunately for the American consumer, it looks like we're almost there.

The Fed's Role in Higher Energy Costs

The Federal Reserve bears some responsibility for these higher prices.

One thing the Fed fails to take into consideration when its members try to tell us inflation is "tame" and "under control" is that the economy is poised for even greater growth at this moment in time.

With the distribution of vaccines throughout most of the country and a decline in virus infection levels, Americans are ready to get out and do what we do so well... consume.

Let's face it – American consumption is unrivaled... It accounts for roughly 70% of U.S. gross domestic product. Plus, our energy consumption is unrivaled in the world... Though Americans constitute just 5% of the population, we account for 24% of the world's oil consumption.

Now during the pandemic, naturally, we stopped spending. People hunkered down, stayed home, and stopped going out to dinner, the movies, and on road trips... They had no choice. But that's all changing now.

The reality is, Americans like and want the good life... so much so, that sadly, many Americans will go into serious debt trying to obtain it. Already, the core personal consumption expenditures price index is already well above the Fed's 2% inflation goal, coming in at 3.1% in April, on the heels of a 1.9% increase in March.

So, with the economy open again, get ready... Inflation is bubbling, and pretty soon, it could come to a boiling point. Energy prices are moving up, and that has a domino effect on everything else.

Higher Energy Means Higher Everything

After all, energy is needed to produce or ship just about anything... So as much as the Biden administration hopes to wean us off our oil addiction, a cutback in oil production couldn't come at a worse time, as far as inflation and the Federal Reserve are concerned.

Less supply with more demand is only going to play out one way – rising prices.

Prices will go up – they already have. The question now is, at what point will those higher prices translate into reduced growth?

Sooner than you might think.

In fact, as I've argued before, the 1970s could resurface with a vengeance (though, hopefully this time we'll leave the bell-bottoms and psychedelic prints in the attic).

The hallmark of that decade included not only that aforementioned bad clothing style, but also gas lines, depressing commentary from then-President Jimmy Carter, and the much-dreaded stagflation.

Stagflation is an economic situation in which there's low growth but high inflation... and there's no reason why that couldn't happen at some point in our near future.

Think about this... Yes, our economy is opening. Yes, there's pent-up demand. Yes, prices are going up... all seemingly healthy occurrences.

But then consider that our federal government wants to encourage people to wait to go back to work by offering generous federal unemployment benefits through September. What does that do to the labor supply? It restricts it, of course. As I wrote last month, why go wash dishes when Uncle Joe will pay you the same to stay home on the couch?

Americans are thoughtful, sensible people who make logical choices. If the government is encouraging them with financial incentives not to work, they won't!

And the effects of that on the overall business community are significant. Employers may need to raise wages significantly (and maybe that's the president's goal?), but at what cost?

You see, if wages go up naturally, then they're sustainable. But if they go up because employers need to compete with the federal government, it's a whole other story... and will lead to additional inflationary pressures. Employers will pay more both in labor costs and in their fundamental product costs (since energy is moving up, too).

All this in turn spells trouble for the U.S. economy – quite possibly leading toward the dreaded path of stagflation.

And what does the Fed do then? Most likely, it will try to scale back on its aggressive monetary policy. But by then, it will be too late. The Fed, in typical government fashion, tends to be reactionary.

Futures Also Make the Case for $100 Oil

Judging by the futures market, it's clear I'm not the only one anticipating a busy summer of travel... A growing number of options traders are eroding the market and betting big on $100 oil. Call options related to Brent and West Texas Intermediate ("WTI") crude oil prices show a bet on oil at $100 by year-end.

The $100 options are now the most widely owned WTI call contracts on the New York Mercantile Exchange.

Oil prices haven't topped $100 since 2014... And though oil is already up 40% this year, it's not inconceivable that we hit this level.

The Pending Inflation Crisis: 'A Global Time Bomb'

The question then becomes, what economic effect will this higher oil have? German investment bank Deutsche Bank put out a warning this week arguing that a global "time bomb" is in the works due to rising inflation, and I couldn't agree more.

According to the bank's analysis, inflation will persist over the coming years, eventually leading to a crisis. Like me, the economic team blames the Fed, suggesting it won't react until it really sees firm evidence of inflation... and by then, it will be too late.

"The consequence of delay will be greater disruption of economic and financial activity than would otherwise be the case when the Fed does finally act," writes David Folkerts-Landau, the chief economist. "In turn, this could create a significant recession and set off a chain of financial distress around the world, particularly in emerging markets."

The question would then become, how much emerging market exposure do American investors have? Like the subprime crisis in 2008, sometimes the diversification of these assets is inherently the problem, since too many investors are exposed.

Unfortunately, the Fed these days really believes it can prevent a crisis. I, however, do not believe that to be the case. Too many Fed governors think they know better... They assume they know how and why people are going to do what they do. As such, they're attempting to outthink the average American.

I've got news for the Fed – it won't work. We're a lot smarter than the Federal Reserve gives us credit for. My advice to the academics on the Fed's board is to get out of the way and never underestimate the power of the American people and the effect we collectively have on the American economy.

And yes... prices are going up. Invest accordingly.

If you want to invest in rising oil, you should consider the SPDR S&P 500 Fund (SPY) or the SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average Fund (DIA). Both are well-regulated funds that track the performance of the underlying indexes and have exposure to energy companies.

As oil prices rise, it should lead to improving profits and earnings at the index member companies. By investing in these exchange-traded funds, you can participate in the rally without having to take the risk of owning the "wrong" company in the "right" sector.