While I'm expecting some short-term bullish moves in the days ahead, the longer-term prospects look dim. See below.
What History Says After the 200-Day Break (by RIA Team)
The 200-day moving average is one of the most widely followed technical levels in markets, and for good reason. When the S&P 500 loses that line, the statistical evidence since 2000 is not comforting for bulls hoping for a quick recovery.
Going back through the seven identifiable sustained breakdowns of the 200-dma since 2000, the data tells a consistent short-term story: the first month is almost universally negative. Not once across all seven events we looked at did the market post a gain in the month following the break. The average one-month return is -5.3%, and the best single outcome was only -0.8%. That is not a rounding error. That’s a pattern.
The picture does not improve much at three and six months. Two-thirds of the three-month windows ended in the red, with an average decline of -3.9%. Six months out, positive outcomes finally show up, but the distribution is everything. The COVID recovery (2020) and the EU crisis rebound (2011) pull the averages up sharply. Without them, the picture is considerably darker. The 2000 and 2008 events remind investors that when the macro backdrop is genuinely deteriorating, the 200-dma break is a warning, not just noise.
The medium-term picture does improve. At 9 and 12 months, more than half of the periods turned positive, and the median return flipped to a gain of +7.0% at 12 months. At 24 months, 71% of periods were positive, with a median return of +19.2%. The long-term recovery argument is real, but investors earned those returns by sitting through average drawdowns that frequently exceeded 15 to 20 percent first.
No comments:
Post a Comment