Whether Zuckerberg is acting purely out of self-preservation after what he and his company have done… |
Whether he himself has felt censored to share his real opinion over the last several years… |
Whether he has become based (i.e. true to oneself and one's beliefs)… |
It doesn't really matter. |
It's an apology to the American public. It's acknowledging and attempting to right a past wrong. And it's setting the record straight. |
As the CEO of Meta, this is exactly what he should have done. |
He has a fiduciary responsibility to act in the best interests of the shareholders and to protect Meta, he needed to step up, admit that what was done was wrong, and demonstrate clearly how Meta would improve. |
He even went so far as to acknowledge the success of X's approach using Community Notes to battle false information. That was the right thing to do. |
Most of the tech community is thrilled with this announcement. To Zuckerberg's point, censorship makes it difficult to innovate. Censorship and the suppression of a constitutional right – freedom of speech – decelerates advancement. It always results in suboptimal outcomes, and it leads to societal chaos and division. |
The free flow of ideas is what accelerates the advancement of society. It is the only way to solve problems quickly and get to a world of abundance. The alternative is a dystopian nightmare.
Jeff Brown |